Skills/ClawHub/xhs-note-analyzer

xhs-note-analyzer@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "小红书作品分析助手。根据笔记ID或链接一键查询作品完整信息，并以专业创作者视角进行多维度深度分析，帮助高效了解作品全貌并获取可操作的优化建议。支持封面图视觉分析与账号定位判断，支持批量查询。触发词：小红书作品分析、查询小红书作品、获取小红书笔记数据、小红书内容分析、xhs笔记详情" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher if530770 · publishing for 164 daysInstalls 461Last detonated 2d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 847 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈483 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim if530770: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim if530770Propose a patch to the maintainer