Skills/ClawHub/xhs-image-note-release

xhs-image-note-release@2.0.7

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "小红书笔记自动发布（图文 + 视频，按扩展名自动判断）。ego-browser 驱动全流程： 上传素材（图文逐张 / 视频单文件+转码轮询）、填标题正文、挂话题、设自定义封面 （COVER_IMAGE，留空用第一帧）、发布或存草稿。带分层退出码与结构化失败输出， 失败默认保留浏览器现场可直接接管。 三种收尾：publish 直接发 / draft 存草稿 / stage 只准备页面。 附 29 种样式卡片生成器（含照片背景氛围与历史古风主题），参数自由配置。 触发词：发小红书、发布图文笔记、发布视频笔记、小红书发帖、存草稿、推到草稿箱。 前置依赖：ego-browser (ego-lite) 运行中，小红书已登录。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher songhonglei · publishing for 1 daysInstalls 770Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedreferences/card-generator/card_generator.py:1292 · Python subprocess execution detectedresult = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 4,502 lines in 41 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,747 tok
1 file · 41 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim songhonglei: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim songhongleiPropose a patch to the maintainer