worldcup-2026-analysis@2.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "2026世界杯/足球比赛量化分析与预测引擎。基于Elo评级+Dixon-Coles泊松+蒙特卡洛模拟，结合网页搜索获取最新赛果/伤病/赔率进行实时校准。提供单场胜平负预测、比分概率、小组出线概率、淘汰赛晋级概率、爆冷分析、赔率价值检测。当用户要求分析足球比赛、预测结果、查看晋级/出线概率、对比球队实力、检测赔率价..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,647 lines in 12 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim luciuszhao0101-dot: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.