workbuddy-health-check@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "一条命令给 WorkBuddy 环境做八维安全稳定体检:磁盘/备份新鲜度/自动化存活/凭据硬编码/备份包完整性/配置/记忆/同步载体,输出体检报告+分级处置清单。适用"WorkBuddy 安不安全/稳不稳定/体检一下/备份还好吗/凭据有没有泄露"等场景。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
notes.append(f"用户级 MEMORY.md 龄 {age:.1f} 天")Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.r = subprocess.run([py, TARGET, "--quick", "--out", tmp],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.