where-we-meet@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "WhereWeMeet / 约哪儿：多人聚会、约饭、聚餐、约会选址 skill。Use when the user asks “Where should we meet”“约哪儿”“找一个谁都不远的地方”“大家住得分散去哪吃/玩”“聚餐去哪”“约饭去哪”“第一个人在...第二个人在...第三个人住...”“A 在..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 136 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gggggyyyyy000: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.