what-to-eat-today@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "为四口之家（夫妻+爷爷+2岁宝宝）规划一天三餐。当用户问「今天吃什么」「帮我安排一下饭菜」「早饭/午饭/晚饭吃什么」「明天带什么饭」「不知道吃啥」等日常吃饭决策问题时主动使用此skill。结合电饭锅预约、蒸菜省时、带饭便当、宝宝和老人适口等约束来推荐。自动感知日期（节气/节日/周末/季节），通过程序脚本实现跨会话..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,182 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kongzichixiangjiao: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.