wenqu-write@0.1.19
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "基于证据撰写中文内容的完整流程，涵盖调研、规划、提纲、逐节写作、审查、配图、翻译和发布 准备，适用于文章、报告、教程、项目介绍、解读和说明材料。当用户要求“写文章”“写报告” “写项目介绍”“源码解析”或“帮我写篇内容”，或使用 "write an article", "write a report", "analyze source code", "deep explanation" 等英文表达时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,186 lines in 17 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gogoingai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.