wenqu-review@0.1.19
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "审查中文内容的事实依据、逻辑连贯性、术语规范、翻译腔、AI 写作痕迹与整体结构，适用于 文章、报告、教程、项目介绍和说明材料。当用户要求“审查”“检查一下”“看看有没有问题” “整体看看”，或使用 "review an article", "review this draft", "proofread" 等英文表达时 使用；可独立运行，也可作为其他写作技能的内联审查阶段。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,257 lines in 13 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gogoingai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.