Skills/ClawHub/wenqu-image

wenqu-image@0.1.19

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "为内容设计并生成、质检、上传、嵌入架构图、流程图、信息图和示意图,覆盖提示词设计到 最终出图。当用户要求“画个架构图”“画流程图”“生成配图”“生成图片”“把图画出来” “渲染一下”或“帮我生图”,或使用 "draw an architecture diagram", "generate an image", "create a flowchart" 等英文表达时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher gogoingai · publishing for 103 daysInstalls 1,018Last detonated 5d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 2,054 lines in 19 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,731 tok
1 file · 19 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gogoingai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim gogoingaiPropose a patch to the maintainer