Skills/ClawHub/web-auto-form

web-auto-form@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "JSON 驱动的浏览器表单自动化工具，为 AI Agent 提供原生 function-calling 集成，支持表单填写、条件分支、数据提取与 PII 脱敏" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher duz1287 · publishing for 171 daysInstalls 695Last detonated 18 min ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,120 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈5,578 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duz1287: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim duz1287Propose a patch to the maintainer