wdp-auto-skills@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI 编码助手的经验会随着会话结束而丢失：解决过的坑、反复走过的弯路、好的设计决策、用户的偏好，统统不被记住。本技能集合要建立一个**持续进化的闭环**： ``` 解决问题 → 检测信号 → 温和提醒 → 蒸馏经验（用户确认）→ 分类入库 → 下次自动生效 ``` 经验分四轨存储，各司其职： | 轨道 | 内容 | 生效范围 | |---|---|---| | 用户画像 | 技术栈、工具链、编码风格、协作偏好 | 所有项目 | | 个人通用经验 | 与项目无关的方法论、通用坑 | 所有项目 | | 行业领域经验 | 行业知识、业务规则（如 GIS/GeoAI） | 同领域项目 | | 项" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 193 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim luckystar513: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.