watchpost@0.1.9
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Check a proposed purchase against Watchpost merchant signals, listing checks and the user's spending rules before an agent pays. Use for a user-requested purchase or subscription when Watchpost is connected; includes authenticated review-status checks." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
console.log(JSON.stringify(result.output, null, 2));Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.No other findings across 839 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lelis92: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.