war-skill@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "红色警戒版《厨房战争》RTS 已完成并验证。 红警风 UI 重做：金属斜角描边 + 金红配色（金 #f0c84a / 红 #e23b3b），侧栏/雷达/菜单全套 chrome；建筑按钮带 emoji 缩略图、建造进度条、生产队列条；新增超级武器面板和维修/拆除区。 集结点（旗帜连线）：选中生产建筑右键设集结点，新兵自动奔向集结点。 维修（扣食材回血）/ 拆除（返还 50% 造价）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
* - mass death cleanup (spawn 30, kill all, array must drain, no NaN)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.No other findings across 3,357 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim hmily741963: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Process kill command≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.