vue@1.0.3

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Builds, debugs, and reviews Vue 3 apps: reactivity, components, composables, Pinia state, Vue Router, forms, and performance. Use when the UI does not update after a state change, a reactive object loses reactivity on destructure or reassignment, .value is forgotten, a watcher never fires or loops ("Maximum recursive updates exceeded"), props or v-model stop syncing, a template ref is null, SSR reports a hydration mismatch, a route param change does not reload the component, Pinia warns "getActivePinia() was called but there was no active Pinia", the console shows "Failed to resolve component" or "Extraneous non-props attributes", a thrown error blanks the page, a long list or large object makes typing lag, a chart or map library breaks after being put in ref(), scoped styles do not reach a child, or when migrating Vue 2 Options API to Composition API and script setup. Not for Nuxt-specific SSR, routing, and data fetching (nuxt), Vite build configuration (vite), or React and Svelte (react, svelte)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ivangdavila · publishing for 275 daysInstalls 4,835Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,989 lines in 21 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈5,087 tok
1 file · 21 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ivangdavila: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ivangdavilaPropose a patch to the maintainer