voicescope-voc-deep-insight@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "将海量评论、工单、问卷和访谈，快速转化为可行动的客户体验洞察。VoiceScope 能自动生成标签体系、批量智能打标，并持续发现标签缺口、重复和粒度问题，辅助智能优化标签口径；通过 AI 语义聚类，自动识别高频痛点、产品亮点和真实用户观点。分析结果可呈现 NSS 四象限、正负向分布及 KEI/KEP × 用户旅程热力图，支持逐层下钻到观点簇和用户原声，并沉淀为可分享的洞察报告。帮助产品、CX、客服和用户研究团队统一判断标准、定位体验问题并确定改进优先级。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,281 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim z18211674869-maker: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.