vision-testcase-generator@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "面向机器视觉（图像处理/视觉检测）领域的标准化测试用例生成技能。 当用户提到以下内容时触发：视觉测试、机器视觉、缺陷检测、AOI、视觉定位、尺寸测量、 OCR/字符识别、读码（二维码/条码）、3D 视觉、工业相机/镜头/光源、图像算法、 Halcon/OpenCV/VisionPro、误检率/漏检率、识别精度、阈值、标定、视觉检测需求、 图像质量、相机参数等需求的测试用例生成。 输入需求文档（Markdown/PDF/Word/Excel）或需求描述，输出按视觉模块分组的、 带优先级着色与模块分隔行的结构化 Excel 测试用例文件。 不适用于：车载/机器人/工业领域（请使用对应领域技能）、自动化测试脚本生成、测试执行。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 859 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.