Skills/ClawHub/video-moodboard

video-moodboard@1.0.8

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Build a moodboard that AI image and video models actually follow, in the order that matters most, and prove it on stills before any video is paid for. Ranked from a 48-still test, 6,086 X posts and 14 official prompt guides: references, light, subject lock, framing, palette, motion, texture, type, sound. Every line is a number or a named thing (hex, Kelvin, lens mm, % of frame, film stock, font, seconds), never "cinematic". Writes moodboard.md and a visual board.html, checks test stills line by line (palette by ΔE), and links 450+ sources: reference libraries, palette, light, type and motion tools, vendor guides, benchmarks, creators' posts. Use for "make a moodboard", "mood board for my video", "style bible", "look and feel", "art direction", "visual brief", "make it not look like AI", or before prompting Seedance, Kling, Veo, Nano Banana or Midjourney. Not for finding references from scratch (find-references) or per-shot prompts after the board is approved (varg-video-prompting)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher vargai · publishing for 215 daysInstalls 230Last detonated 44 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

CRITICAL
HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentREADME.md:1 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentGenerated by .github/readme/build.ts from SKILL.md files and .github/readme/*.json. Edit those and run `bun .github/readme/build.ts`; CI fails when this file isFix: Keep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.
AST01

No other findings across 2,500 lines in 14 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,053 tok
1 file · 14 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim vargai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim vargaiPropose a patch to the maintainer