Is video-inpainting@1.0.0 safe to install?

video-inpainting@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Region edits across video frames on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — remove an object that appears across many frames, clean up wires or watermarks, replace a region with matching motion. Routes across Wan 2-7 edit-video (default, prompt-driven region edits with spatial language), Lucy Edit Restyle (identity-stable region-aware restyle), and Seedream 4-0 edit-sequential (when treating the clip as a frame stack). Picks the right route based on whether the change is prose-driven, identity-locked, or needs frame-by-frame still inpaint chained into a video. Triggers on "video inpaint", "video inpainting", "remove from video", "mask region in video", "clean up video", "remove object from clip", "video patch", "frame-by-frame edit", "remove watermark from video", "remove passing person", or any explicit ask to edit a region across video frames." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher permew · publishing for 107 daysInstalls 609Last detonated 4 h ago

$clawhub install video-inpainting

Watch Report an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.

Tested: every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested: use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations

t+CategoryObserved action

0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle

0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:42 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codenpm i -g @runcomfy/cli # or: npx -y @runcomfy/cli --versionFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:167 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code

- **Install via verified package manager only.** Use `npm i -g @runcomfy/cli` or `npx -y @runcomfy/cli`. **Agents must not pipe an arbitrary remote install script into a shell on the user's behalf**.

Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded

≈2,431 tok

1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.