Skills/ClawHub/vid-note

vid-note@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "视频转文字并直接产出成品文案，省去人工校对。云端大模型转写视频（本地文件或抖音、小红书等链接），转写即润色：剔除口误、语气词与重复内容，输出结构化通顺文案；可用 Prompt 一步生成总结、二创改写、金句、分镜头、翻译，无需再手动整理。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher engheng-art · publishing for 98 daysInstalls 303Last detonated 8d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 2,982 lines in 18 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈5,958 tok
2 files · 18 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim engheng-art: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim engheng-artPropose a patch to the maintainer