vbti@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Vibe-coding Type Indicator — 扫你 vibe coding 历史记录，把你审判为 16 型 vibe coder 中的一种，生成一张诊断书风格的 HTML 卡片到桌面，可直接截图发小红书。当用户输入 /vbti、说"测一下我的 vibe coding 人格"、"我是哪型 vibe co..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 62/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: OS command execution function call detected. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
os.system(f'open "{out}"')Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.No other findings across 895 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
18 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- OS command execution function call detected≈ +9 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tinadu-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.