Skills/ClawHub/varg-video-editing

varg-video-editing@1.0.2

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Which service to edit an existing video with, and how to edit it without breaking it. A routing guide for ten editing jobs: cut, trim, resize and join (FFmpeg, the varg ffmpeg tool, Rendi), talking-head cleanup (silence and filler cuts from word timestamps: auto-editor, Descript, ElevenLabs Scribe, Groq Whisper), long video to Shorts (OpusClip, or transcript + Gemini + FFmpeg), captions and subtitles (ASS through FFmpeg, Remotion, HyperFrames, Submagic, ZapCap), assembling from a timeline or template (HyperFrames, Remotion, Shotstack, Creatomate), AI edits that restyle, swap people, relight or extend (varg Recast/Relight/ID-V2V, Runway Aleph, Luma Ray, Wan VACE), dubbing and lip sync (HeyGen, ElevenLabs Dubbing, Sync Labs), upscaling, slow motion and background removal (Topaz, SeedVR, Bria), finding moments and QA (Gemini, varg video-analyze, Twelve Labs, VideoDB), and handing the cut to DaVinci Resolve, Premiere or Final Cut. Use when someone asks to edit, cut, trim, shorten, clip, reframe, caption, subtitle, translate, dub, lip-sync, upscale, restyle or clean up footage they already have, or asks which tool or API to edit video with. Not for making a video from a brief (varg-ai and the format skills)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher vargai · joined 7 days agoInstalls 0Last detonated 6d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 385 lines in 4 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim vargai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim vargai