Skills/ClawHub/varg-occasion-video

varg-occasion-video@1.0.5

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Turns a few photos and the details of an occasion into an AI video on varg: a wedding or birthday invitation and save-the-date that unfolds (the names and date printed right), a Christmas, New Year, Diwali, Eid or Lunar New Year greeting, old family photos brought to life, a love story across the eras for an anniversary, and a calm memorial or tribute film. Asks what the occasion needs, makes the stills first (GPT Image 2.5 prints names and dates), animates them (Seedance 2.5, Kling 4, Wan 3), adds music and exports for WhatsApp, a party screen or a service. Use when someone asks for a video invitation, an e-invite, a save-the-date, a wedding invitation video for WhatsApp, a holiday or festival greeting video, an animated e-card or Christmas card, "bring old photos to life", an anniversary or love-story video, or a memorial, celebration-of-life, retirement or farewell tribute. Not for birthdays (use varg-birthday-video) or editing real wedding footage (varg-video-editing)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher vargai · publishing for 215 daysInstalls 324Last detonated 31 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

CRITICAL
HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentREADME.md:1 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentGenerated by .github/readme/build.ts from SKILL.md files and .github/readme/*.json. Edit those and run `bun .github/readme/build.ts`; CI fails when this file isFix: Keep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.
AST01

No other findings across 558 lines in 8 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,962 tok
1 file · 8 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim vargai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim vargaiPropose a patch to the maintainer