vadeepresearch@1.2.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "系统化深度研究技能。适用于联网研究、市场分析、竞品分析、行业研究、技术调研、论文与开源项目梳理、报告写作前置调研、PPT/文档/方案生成前的信息搜集与深度分析。当用户提出深度分析xxx、帮我分析xxx、快速分析xxx、深度研究xxx、详细分析xxx等话术时使用该 skills。必须输出 Markdown（.md）文件，并提供下载地址或可直接打开的文件入口。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,535 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim va-ais: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.