url-to-obsidian@1.0.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "通过网址获取网页内容并创建为 Obsidian 笔记。支持技术文档、博客文章、GitHub README 等类型网页。 支持可选的中文翻译（代码块、命令、包名、URL 保持不变），排版结构清晰简洁。 优先使用 opencli web read 抓取，不可用时自动降级到 Firecrawl、fetchWebContent、fetch。 使用前会主动收集信息：链接地址、笔记名称、存储位置、是否翻译 —— 信息不明确时提供选项让用户选择， 用户也可一键确认默认建议。自动生成 frontmatter、标签和来源信息。 Triggers on: 保存网址到obsidian、网页转obsidian笔记、u" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 960 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wufengsheng: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.