upstream-material-cn@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "上游材料股研究框架。对不直接面向终端的上游材料公司（铜箔/衬底/晶体/树脂/玻纤/载板基材等）进行系统化深度分析。用于：(1)梳理上游材料在产业链中的位置和传导路径，(2)量化供需格局和价格弹性，(3)测算材料放量对标的公司利润结构的影响，(4)对比同赛道竞争者形成投资判断。触发词：上游材料分析、材料股研究、供应..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 336 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim pcchris1995: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.