unix@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Unix 深度需求分析与工程执行流程（六阶段）：苏格拉底澄清 → 第一性原理拆解 → 科斯定理自研/外部取舍 → 严格范围编码 → 墨菲/对抗性审查 → 精简交付。 在用户输入需求、说 Unix、/unix、或要求严谨分析/最小成本交付时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 317 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim taotao52: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.