unified-research-finder@1.1.1
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "统一的学术文献检索助手。覆盖两大体系：(1) PubMed 官方 E-utilities API（esearch+efetch，真实 PMID/摘要/DOI）与 PubMed 网页检索；(2) Google Scholar 及其镜像站——灯塔学术搜索、烂番薯学术搜索、Google Scholar 香港镜像、Google Scholar 官方站，以及 KipHub学术、学术搜索Pro 等大陆镜像，按「kiphub → 烂番薯 → 学术搜索Pro → 灯塔 → 香港 → 官方」优先级自动回退。当用户要找文献、查论文、搜 PubMed、查 Google 学术/谷歌学术、用学术镜像站、要影响因子或引用" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
proc = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.No other findings across 1,853 lines in 10 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.