Skills/ClawHub/tvs-code-reviewer

tvs-code-reviewer@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "稳定、证据驱动的代码审查 Skill。用户要求代码审查、review、找 bug、找问题、毒舌审查、检查当前 diff、审 PR 或审指定文件时使用。必须先确认扫描范围;按固定审查通道寻找真实问题;输出按严重程度排序的发现、证据、影响、置信度;问题标题要毒舌但准确。只指出问题,不代改代码。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher inksnowhailong · publishing for 181 daysInstalls 748Last detonated 27 min ago
$clawhub install tvs-code-reviewer
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 95/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 254 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈940 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.