traveler@1.0.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "旅行行程规划助手。根据用户提供的出发地、目的地、天数、预算、人群与兴趣，生成结构化、可执行的每日行程单（时间轴+交通衔接+餐饮住宿+预算估算+避坑与备选），行程涉及出行/门票/美食/大交通时主动索引滴滴/飞猪/酒店/景区/美团等三方服务并附负责声明（仅规划、不代下单）。适用于自由行/亲子/情侣/朋友/家庭等场景。触发词：行程规划、旅行计划、旅游攻略、几日游、旅游路线、定制行程、帮我安排、itinerary、travel plan。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 146 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim onsoul: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.