travel-itinerary-builder@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "旅行行程规划总入口。当用户提出多日旅行规划、制作旅行手册、定制亲子/家庭出游行程、 或任何涉及 "旅行计划" "行程安排" "出游攻略" "旅游攻略" "day trip" "itinerary" 等请求时触发。产出格式为自包含 HTML（零外部 CDN 依赖），包含每日时间线、 景点卡片（图片/交通/流程/贴士）、能量趋势图、后勤工具箱。内容深度对标首尔 6 日 亲子游手册——每个景点都有时间预估、交通指引、why/how/tips 三层信息结构。 自动适配航班时刻、当地天气、儿童年龄。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,012 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim linex5709: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.