travel-expense-faq@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "企业差旅费报销常见问题解答（FAQ）。基于公司官方差旅费报销制度、线上报销流程管理办法和客户端操作手册，整理提供差旅费报销常见问题的标准答案。触发词：差旅费报销、报销常见问题、报销FAQ、报销规定、报销流程、报销标准、出差报销。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,770 lines in 11 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim longtel-skill: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.