Skills/ClawHub/tlctc-classify

tlctc-classify@2.6.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Classify cyber security incidents, CVEs, threat-intelligence reports, red-team write-ups, and vendor advisories using the TLCTC v2.7 taxonomy (10 cause-oriented threat clusters, 10 axioms, 17 R-* classification rules incl. the R-SCOPE scope gate and R-SPECIFIC, System Risk Event doctrine, DRE refinement tree, consequence chain, attack-path notation with Δt velocity and boundary operators). Use whenever the user asks to analyze, classify, deconstruct, or build attack paths for security documents, or references "TLCTC", "threat clusters", "attack path", "#1"–"#10" cluster IDs, or "TLCTC-XX.YY" identifiers." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher barnes70 · joined 4 days agoInstalls 245Last detonated 4d ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-30 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,366 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim barnes70: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim barnes70