Skills/ClawHub/three-period-radar-v2

three-period-radar-v2@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "A股三周期趋势雷达 v2.0（融合版）：月线/周线/日线共振分析 + 分时四层职权 + 大盘-板块-个股空间联动 + 持仓适配。当用户要求'盘一下持仓'、'三周期分析'、'共振买点'、'这个票能不能买/卖'、'板块龙头扫描'、'调仓建议'，或给出持仓表格要求技术面建议时触发。与《股市成长手册》均线体系、分时线三周期滤网、道格拉斯心理分析完全对齐。每日盘后自动调用，输出结构化JSON供agent解析。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher agentforge-cyber · joined 0 days agoInstalls 282Last detonated 2 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,103 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈635 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim agentforge-cyber: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim agentforge-cyberPropose a patch to the maintainer