Skills/ClawHub/thinking-method-selector

thinking-method-selector@2026.11.15

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Use when the user describes a problem, decision or stuck situation but names no method: "how should I approach this?", "help me think this through", "we can't decide", "where do I start?". Picks the best-fit thinking method and runs it. Skip for plain execution tasks or when a method is named." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ysskrishna · publishing for 40 daysInstalls 358Last detonated 1 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Process kill commandSKILL.md:66 · Process kill command — agent can terminate processes- **strategic-thinking:** define the win and non-goals; read the landscape; test for advantage; compare 2-4 options with bet, cost, kill signal; choose; list risks and a review trigger.Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
AST05

No other findings across 159 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,872 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ysskrishna: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Process kill command≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ysskrishnaPropose a patch to the maintainer