therapyportal-mcp@0.5.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Read a TherapyNotes client portal (www.therapyportal.com/p/<practice>/) from a shell — upcoming therapy appointments, document/paperwork requests (pending and completed), always-available practice forms, balances due, payment receipts, secure-message threads, and completed forms or receipts downloaded as PDFs — through the user's signed-in portal tab with the fpx CLI. Use when asked about TherapyPortal / TherapyNotes, therapy appointments or sessions, paperwork the therapist sent, what is owed to the practice, or a therapy receipt." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 382 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chrischall: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.