test-case-design@1.0.8
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "这项技能应在为特定场景或者功能生成测试用例、编写测试用例、设计测试用例、补充异常场景和边界值、设计复杂交互测试用例、输出标准化测试用例，比如：功能测试、兼容性测试、适应性测试、API 测试、UI 可视化测试、移动端/应用/小程序/H5/桌面/PC 网页测试、AI agent测试、联动测试或路由测试等场景中使用。仅..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,061 lines in 20 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cassianran: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.