tencent-doc-link-archiver@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "腾讯文档链接解析、下载、归档入库。当用户输入包含 docs.qq.com 链接的文本，自动提取腾讯文档链接→逐个导出下载→保存至桌面/腾讯文档/目录→更新Excel台账。触发词：下载腾讯文档、归档腾讯文档、保存腾讯文档、备份腾讯文档、批量下载腾讯文档、解析腾讯文档链接。只处理 docs.qq.com 域名链接，忽..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 209 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim pufanuzhu-hash: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.