Skills/ClawHub/taste-paper

taste-paper@0.1.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Strictly triage research papers for real methodological novelty, hard evidence, baseline fairness, and long-term impact. Use for arXiv triage, paper review,..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher 197895 · publishing for 150 daysInstalls 558Last detonated 33 h ago
$clawhub install taste-paper
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 740 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,186 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.