task-decomposition@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "任务分解器。把一句目标/需求自动拆成可执行的层级化工作分解结构（WBS）：阶段 → 任务 → 步骤，附依赖关系、工时估算（S/M/L）与建议执行顺序。纯规则、本地可跑，把"我要做 X"变成"第 1 步做 A、第 2 步做 B"。当用户需要"把这个目标拆成任务""帮我规划步骤""做个 WBS""decompose this goal""制定执行计划"时调用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 381 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qq435912743: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.