Skills/ClawHub/szu-campus

szu-campus@0.2.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "当用户需要通过本地 szu-cli 查询或操作深圳大学校园事务时使用,包括登录检查、公文通、我的课表、全校课表、成绩、绩点排名、培养方案、学业完成、思政学分、创新讲座、宿舍电费、体育场馆预约、图书馆馆藏、知网和万方检索。指导 agent 使用 JSON 输出、安全处理隐私,并对预约和取消执行 dry-run/co..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher awesomehou · publishing for 126 daysInstalls 918Last detonated 3d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 377 lines in 9 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈451 tok
1 file · 9 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim awesomehou: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim awesomehouPropose a patch to the maintainer