synomega@1.8.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Retrosynthesis, reaction prediction, and synthesizability for organic molecules, using the synomega Python package (pip install synomega) — runs locally, works out of the box. Six capabilities: single-step retrosynthesis (product → reactants, candidate disconnections), single-step forward reaction prediction / reaction outcome (reactants → product), multi-step route planning down to purchasable building blocks, a continuous synthesizability / makeability score (SynScore), reaction-plausibility screening, and multi-component evolution (growing a forward synthesis network from a set of reactants, e.g. one-pot / multicomponent chemistry). Use this whenever the user gives a molecule (as SMILES or a resolvable name) and asks how to make / synthesize it, whether it can be made or how hard, how to rank molecules by ease of synthesis, what reactants give a target, what product a set of reactants gives, a reaction outcome, or how a reactant mixture evolves — i.e. for retrosynthesis, synthesis planning, cheminformatics, and reaction-prediction tasks. Safety judgments for hazardous, controlled, or otherwise dual-use compounds are deferred to the host's safety policy (see "Safety boundary / dual-use" below)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 731 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zbc0315: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.