sustoiclab-negotiation@0.1.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "谈判说服技术识破工具箱 · Su's StoicLab（简体中文技能，面向中文用户）。站在被说服者一侧，完整剖析谈判与说服场景中对方使用的技术——沉锚效应、高低球/渐进承诺、认知失调/自我说服、互惠法则、框架效应、偏见与刻板印象利用、模糊反馈与归因操控。帮用户识破这些手法、守住决策自主权，并提供正当沟通的回应技巧（镜像、标注、语调、动态沉默）。用于学习、识别与预防。原创作品 by 苏庶 @ 钝感实验室。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 657 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim susstoiclab: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.