Skills/ClawHub/superstition-debunker

superstition-debunker@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Use when a forwarded message, viral post, chain letter, or "they don't want you to know" claim needs a quick credibility read — detects the rhetorical fingerprints of folklore (vague authority, suppression urgency, forwarding quotas, unfalsizable mechanisms, single-case causation, unsourced percentages) across 6 pattern families, scores myth-signature strength, and generates the exact questions that would settle it. Structural triage, not fact lookup." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher voronindenis5 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 137Last detonated 2 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 607 lines in 6 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim voronindenis5: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim voronindenis5