Skills/ClawHub/super-deep-coding

super-deep-coding@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Deep Coding is a multi-agent development system designed for complex software projects. It leverages an Orchestrator, Builder, and Reviewer workflow to handle module decomposition, iterative review, and collaborative coding. Activate when users request deep coding, multi-agent collaboration, or comp" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher molexazwo · publishing for 137 daysInstalls 426Last detonated 2d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:14 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code| `playwright` | E2E browser testing (Reviewers) | Optional, for E2E | `npx playwright --version` |Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
LOW
Rule modification attemptreferences/orchestrator-rules.md:315 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions · informational: not an instruction file**Rule 1: HTML projects MUST be tested in a browser — no file-only review**Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
LOW
Rule modification attemptreferences/orchestrator-rules.md:324 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions · informational: not an instruction file**Rule 2: All review checklists must be written to review_history**Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
LOW
Rule modification attemptreferences/orchestrator-rules.md:330 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions · informational: not an instruction file**Rule 3: Integration-test must verify ALL dependent modules are truly integrated**Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,271 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim molexazwo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim molexazwoPropose a patch to the maintainer