subcontractor-qualification-check-free@1.0.3
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "分包商资质与安全许可台账逐项核对，本免费版执行引擎声明的 6 项检查（证件有效期覆盖、资质等级匹配、人员证件一致性、重复登记、合同金额勾稽、空白占位符日期格式状态非法），每条结论引用原文行号与日期，材料不足只报缺什么不给结论。触发词包括 分包商资质与安全许可核对、分包商资质台账、资质与安全许可台账、分包商证件过期、特种作业人员证件核对、每月资质复核。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,037 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.