Skills/ClawHub/structs-intel

structs-intel@1.25.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Intelligence gathering in Structs — scouting players, planets, guilds, and the galaxy before you act. Use when assessing a raid target, checking a planet's defenses and Command Ship status, profiling an opponent, surveying the galaxy, or refreshing competitive intel. Persists findings to memory/intel/ so they survive context resets." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher abstrct · publishing for 81 daysInstalls 358Last detonated 6d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Process kill commandSKILL.md:27 · Process kill command — agent can terminate processes…fleet out-damage the defense within the vulnerability window (and, for a siege, kill the Command Ship before an active defender rebuilds it)? 3. **Reward** — unrefin…Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
AST05

No other findings across 193 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,268 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim abstrct: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Process kill command≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim abstrctPropose a patch to the maintainer