story-short-analyze@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "短篇网文拆文。拆解爆款短篇小说（番茄短篇 / 故事会 / 知乎盐选 / 追妻 / 世情 / 重生 / 虐渣等通俗题材）的故事核、结构、情感线、反转设计、写作手法、共鸣层次。 单一全量拆解管道：跑完 Stage 2-6 产出完整拆文报告，落盘到 `拆文库/{书名}/`， 下游 `story-short-write`..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 6,984 lines in 22 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 9438190: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.