store-location-analysis@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "开店选址综合分析助手。用户输入目标地址和开店类型,自动整合高德地图实时数据(地理编码、POI搜索、交通态势),从人流量、用户群体、客流特点、消费情况、竞品分析六大维度进行评估,生成交互式HTML可视化选址报告(含评分仪表盘、雷达图、竞品对比表、行动建议)。覆盖餐饮零售服务等全业态。触发词:开店选址、选址分析、店铺..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
python generate_report.py --input analysis_result.json [--output report.html]Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.No other findings across 1,365 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.