Skills/ClawHub/storage-unit-verdict

storage-unit-verdict@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Use when paying for a storage unit (or considering one) — computes whether the unit still makes economic sense: contents depreciated value vs cumulative rent, the untouched-12-months rule, purge/downgrade/keep verdicts, climate-control need test, and a dated 30-day move-out plan." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher voronindenis5 · joined 12 days agoInstalls 0Last detonated 19 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 549 lines in 6 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim voronindenis5: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim voronindenis5