stop-slop-zh@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "写、起草、生成、润色任何面向人读的中文文章或段落时，都要用本 Skill——公众号、博客、知乎、小红书、技术文档、技术方案、设计文档、README、公文、学术摘要、产品文案、复盘、提案、新闻稿、邮件。无论是从零写新稿，还是改稿、审稿，只要在产出中文长文，写完、定稿、交付、发布前都必须调用它过一遍：它识别并消除中文..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 975 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim leeguooooo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.